sunday progress update

I finally finally(!!) finished scene 60, the Scene From Verbiage River. Three more scenes to go. So… close… to… finish line.

I have my last three FO cards fanned out in front of me. They look so small, and few, and doable.

Unfortunately, they are all red and they brightly tell me what to do but not how to do it. The scene descriptions are along the lines of “Break into Castle of Doom (dum dum dum!), steal Device of Great Power (da da da!), rescue Princess (*trumpets blare*) and escape intact”.

And, er, how exactly is Hero supposed to do all this with just a pocket knife and a piece of twine, again?

That’s what I have to figure out.

How’s your writing going?

Share on TwitterShare via email

ten drafts, or one?

Talk about being on opposite sides of the spectrum!: Does rewriting make your story better or worse?

Me, I fall somewhere in the middle. My first drafts are me trying to tell the story to myself. They’re the place where I can spend pages describing a forest scene, leap without any thought for logic or consistency to the moon in the next paragraph, follow enticing rabbit trails into Land of the Next Story, return to This Story by way of a dream sequence, change the hero’s eye color five times and inadvertently kill of the heroine’s siblings from one scene to the next. To me, they’re the raw material that I then pare and cut, mold and shape. I need a couple of good goes at the ms before it’s beta-ready.

And I know a lot of writers work similarly.

But, goodness! Ten drafts? Fifteen drafts? I’d spork my eyes if I had to go through that many drafts–and this is before editorial input. That many revisions would suck the soul out of the story and the joy out of my writing. Nuh-uh. I’d rather give the story its chance in the world, trunk it if it didn’t sell, and go write the next one.

Every writer is different. There are writers who produce quality work in one or two drafts, and others who need ten or fifteen. My takeaway from reading these two posts pretty much back-to-back is: do what works for you. Find your own way. Tweak other writers’ methods to suit yourself. Own the process.

Few writing “rules” are set in stone.

Share on TwitterShare via email

on self-publishing e-books

Several weeks ago, I looked at e-books from a reader’s perspective. Now I want to look at self-publishing e-books from writer’s point of view.

The reality is: more and more people are buying e-books. It’s easy to upload your book to a site like Smashwords for free. Pro authors like JA Konrath are riding the wave and doing very well, even going so far as to turn down print publication offers in order to self-publish electronically. Konrath’s enthusiasm for this Brave New World of publishing is contagious, and he has a large following and (of course) his skeptics.

The e-book option allows a writer to bring out-of-print backlists back into readers’ hands with minimum outlay of money. It allows her to continue series that are no longer commercially viable for publishing houses, and give away work for free or cheap, thus creating a fan base. It might even offer an author a way out of the Three-Book Death Spiral and keep getting books out to their readers even if no publisher will touch them.

So far, great.

E-books offer the oft-rejected hopeful a chance to bypass the gatekeepers and slow-moving machinery of publishing and get his works directly into the hands of readers.  He can upload his book as soon as he is ready. No waiting on the schedules of editors, cover artists, marketers, and all the other people involved in the release of a book at a publishing house.

And that’s where the ease of publishing in e-book format may be dangerous for writers.

Sometimes we writers are just desperate to have someone—anyone, even ihasboox from NJ–read the stories we’ve worked so hard on. We want someone who is not our spouse, BFF or cat to enjoy our book. Why not upload it to a site frequented by hundreds of potential readers?  Like, right now.

Because first impressions are important. The lure of just-add-water instant readership can blind a writer to the need to critically examine and polish his work. Often, a writer only has that one chance to snag a reader. And a reader who is put off by sloppy plotting, poor characterization, bad grammar and typos (and we’re all prone to that at some time or another) is not likely to return to the writer’s work (especially not with all the other books jostling for space on her virtual bookshelf!).

Also, readers are used to professional-level packaging. Yeah, story is what matters, but I admit to being superficial—a badly-made cover image is just begging me to reject the book. Ditto for a long-winded and ponderous blurb. As a reader, I’m looking to reject 99.9% of the books out there. There are  hundreds of titles published every in my preferred genres. I only read 60-75 books a year, and I’m willing to bet that I read more than your average American (yeah, like this article says). Kinda sobering, eh?

So, now that I’m done opining, what are your thoughts on self-publishing e-books?

Annnnd, some related posts that I couldn’t fit above:

Share on TwitterShare via email

sunday progress update

Got 56 out of 63 scenes, and a healthy chunk out of scene 57 (which promises to be long long long).

I need to pace myself better. On Thursday I got through 2 new scenes in a couple of intense writing sessions. I was so burnt out from that, I spent all of Friday reading (books 2 and 3 of the Codex Alera, thankyouverymuch). Hemmed and hawed and dillydallied Saturday before getting in another two scenes. Started tonight’s writing session late because I’m so up and down and all around in terms of mood. Bad diet? Not enough exercise? Too much story intensity?

School starts tomorrow. The kids are excited. I spent some time today organizing our school shelves. Barring a few miscellany, we’re all set to go!

Share on TwitterShare via email

*giggle*

I must’ve been really punch-drunk or tired (sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference) when I wrote the following in my first draft:

Chapter [Holy Moly, what chapter am I up to?] Twenty One

Stuck in the dark in Shimmer with Soul Eaters and a Flammable Painting

“You’re [spoiler].” Rafe felt like he had been saying the same words in varying degress of stunned, open-mouthed astonishment hundreds of times, but he felt like a stuck music box, unable to progress beyond a certain note.

*grin* Poor Rafe. Let’s see if I can help him out here a bit. :D

Share on TwitterShare via email

bits of research

While working on my brand-new scenes, I’ve had to hit Google for some quick information on:

Why yes, things go BOOM! a whole lot in this book. How did you know?

Have you found yourself venturing into unexpected and unknown territory while doing research for your story lately?

(I find that a quick blog post works as a good transition from my intense get-this-scene-DONE writing session to Real Life, so you’ll be seeing me around more in your feed reader/email *grin*).

Share on TwitterShare via email

out of practice

I don’t know why, but I had this delightful illusion (delusion?) that I would get back from Maine and jump feet first into all my on-hold projects the minute I walked through the door (okay, maybe an hour after I walked in).

Ha ha.

It took three days after my return before I got my revising space set up. And then, like my piano-playing fingers, my revising muscles were clumsy and uncertain from the disuse. I’ve been pushing them, though, because I do have that self-imposed August 18th deadline looming on the horizon. Time marches on, regardless of whether or not my revising is humming along at optimal speed, like well-oiled machinery.

51 out of 63 scenes down (including the smushing together of several scenes). 12 more to go, most of them on red cards (meaning they need to be written from scratch). Also, school starts next week, so I’ve been organizing shelves, putting out the new books, ordering items through interlibrary loan and making lists of additional supplies.

I haven’t forgotten about those pictures, but, well, folks, Quartz takes priority. Soon. Really.

How are you all doing?

Share on TwitterShare via email

july reading roundup

The Spirit Lens by Carol Berg: An impulse grab at the library, but oh, so worth it. Set in a pseudo-Renaissance world, this features an unlikely trio of failed mage-turned-librarian, a court dandy and a lowborn mage with great powers and heretical ideas  secretly investigating the magical assassination attempts on the king. Sequel comes out next year (not soon enough for me, as I am desperate to know how the character arcs are going to turn out). In the meantime, must seek out other books by the same author.

The Genius in All of Us by David Shenk: Writer claims that how we turn out is based on a complex interaction between genetics and the environment. I could’ve told you that. *grin*. Anyway, Shenk attempts to debunk the myth of innate giftedness, pointing out that deliberate practice reshapes our brain. He shows how child prodigies like Mozart are actually a product of their own drive, environment and parental influence, rather than springing out of nowhere. Seems commonsensical to me, really…

Magic Lost, Trouble Found by Lisa Shearin: I wanted to like this book more than I did. It’s a decent story competently told, but it has an urban fantasy tone to it that doesn’t work for me (I’m not a big fan of UF). I found the voice and attitudes to be really contemporary and jarring in their otherworld setting. But if you like urban fantasy, I think you’ll like this one more than I did.

The Strangely Beautiful Tale of Miss Percy Parker by Leanna Renee Heiber: I thought I was picking up a fantasy with a romantic subplot, but what I got was really a romance with a fantasy subplot. The protagonist, Miss Percy Parker, is timid and passive and doesn’t *do* anything besides swoon and shrink and cling to her One True Love. The lyrical prose turned overheated and cloying pretty quickly. I don’t think I’m the intended audience for this one. Pity, because that Gothic/Victorian setting was such a draw.

The Drowning City by Amanda Downum: Ah, finally a fantasy I could really get into–I was beginning to think my vacation reads were all going to be disappointments! The tropical setting, with its canals and jungles and monsoons grabbed me, and I liked the way the POV is passed around among three women on different sides of the multifaceted political situation in Symir. Some things that didn’t work for me: I felt like I didn’t get much of a handle on how the gem-based magical system really works and Issylt didn’t live up to her billing as super-spy. But she’s a sympathetic enough character that I would follow her into a sequel. Also, as a fun aside, I was rather taken aback when one of the Middle Eastern-inspired character names was my maiden name–I don’t expect to run across my name in fantasy novels!

Furies of Calderon by Jim Butcher: First off, a BIG thank you to my wonderful husband who drove most of the way home from Maine so I could finish reading this first volume of what promises to be a sweeping epic story. The Alerans are furycrafters, using the spirits of air and water, fire and earth, wood and metal, to protect, fight and build. But their homeland is in trouble as a rebellious High Lord works to overthrow the First Lord Gaius, and the savage Marat are on the move against them. Young Tavi, at fifteen, is unusual in that he has shown no ability to furycraft. When he finds himself thrust into the affairs of lords and armies, he must rely on his wits and courage. Tavi was a wonderfully sympathetic character (I really liked how he operated without the benefit of furycrafting), and the rest of the characters, both protags and antags, were compelling if not always likeable. This was the best of my vacation reads and I’m happy to note that all the books are out and waiting for me on bookstore/library shelves. Definitely recommended.

Any good reads this July?

Share on TwitterShare via email