The Hunger Games: a review

Dystopian SF meets extreme Survivor in The Hunger Games, and its sequel, Catching Fire, by Suzanne Collins. In the far-future, the United States no longer exists. Instead, a nation called Panem has risen from the remnants, in which twelve districts are ruled by the oppressive Capitol. As punishment for their rebellion 75 years ago, the districts are forced to send teenaged tributes–one male, one female–to the Capital every year to participate in the Hunger Games, a televised fight-to-the-death, in which there can be only one victor.

Katniss of District 12 has supplemented her family’s income after her father’s death in a mining accident by (illegally) hunting and trapping in the woods surrounding her district. When her 13-year-old sister Prim’s name is drawn during the selection of the tributes, Kat volunteers to take her place. Kat and her fellow tribute, Peeta (the boy who has had a crush on her forever), are taken to the Capital where they are dined and styled and interviewed before being thrust into the arena.

I won’t spoil the ending for you, but Kat does reappear in the second book, a survivor of the Games. She has hardly put the Games behind her before she goes on a victory tour to districts simmering with rebellion against the Capitol. As she becomes a symbol of revolution, the Capitol’s malignant leader, President Snow, has her and her family in his cross hairs.

Much is to be made of books that I found hard to put down, even though they include a plot device that is a personal non-favorite–the love triangle. Even worse, we don’t know (after 2 books) how this will be resolved (I like to know which guy will get the girl so I can root for the right one :D ). But I’m so caught up in the story I don’t care. The world is changing, revolution is brewing, her survival is at stake–of course Kat isn’t sitting around plucking petals of daisies going, “I love him, I love him not”.

What does bother me is how evil is embodied in President Snow and his oppressive Peacekeeper goons. We are not told whether Snow is an elected limited-term president or a dictator for life, but the role of ultimate villain falls to him, even though the Hunger Games and the oppression of the districts started seventy five years ago. They seem to me to be an institutionalized evil, not merely a personal one. The Capitol dwellers are portrayed as hopelessly flighty, shallow, and twittery; charming children who aren’t—but should be—held to account for their role in watching, encouraging and indulging in the Hunger Games.

I should also very much like to know how this system was set up in the first place (and why someone thought taking tributes every year to fight to the death was such a good idea, seeing that it might inflame the populace of the subject districts). I hope the final book will provide answers.

But these books surprised me, given how much I don’t love dystopian SF. The last book, Mockingjay, comes out in the fall. Yet another book to look forward to!

sunday linkfest

How do authors really break into publishing? Is it nepotism? The Secret Handshake? Stalking agents? Brewing potions from eye of newt and toe of frog? Author Jim C. Hines took a survey, published the results and busted a few myths along the way. I’m happy to note that I still have several years to break into the book biz.

Got a character who remains an enigma? Sit him down with chips and drinks and ask him a few questions.

LOL: SF author John C. Wright will never, not ever, include Christian allegory, themes, or images in his next book.

Book Review Bingo! I’m afraid to do this with my own reviews on this blog. Can I buy a dispensation for using “X meets X” in my next review?

Did you stumble upon anything hilarious, inspirational, thought-provoking or informative in ‘Netland this week?

friday fun: coloring

Coloring is often dismissed as boring busywork or a creativity-killer (and when it’s forced on a child, I agree it can be so). That said, my children will often want to color of their own volition. I find coloring to be soothing, allowing my hands to work, pencils and markers gliding across the page, while my mind is elsewhere. Coloring is companionable, everybody sitting in comfy silence, broken only by requests for a particular shade of green. And, when there are so many beautiful and fantastically detailed drawings to choose from, coloring is just plain fun!

This week, the kids and I put up a rainforest (complete with trees named Tom, Bob and Ben) mural in our back hall. While looking for rainforest animals to inhabit the mural,  I came across these fantastic offerings by children’s picture books writer and illustrator Jan Brett. Her whole site is full of eye-pleasing coloring pages.

An art blog (I forget which, otherwise I’d give credit), linked to this lovely clipart site a long time ago. Many of these illustrations would make great coloring pages.

Where would we be without lists of the best? Here are (someone’s take on) the Top 10 Coloring Pages Websites (note: not all of these are free).

Dover publishes some real little gems of coloring books.

How do you view coloring? What memories are associated with it? Do you have any favorite coloring sites?

art in the family

Sir I. has been into rockets in a big way. Here’s the one he made at the library’s art program:

Miss M. made this sun (with salt dough) when we were studying Mexico:

Both older kids drawing together:

This is the circle-inspired art I did for the February creative challenge at daisy yellow:

Doodling, and playing around with the nifty-fifty lens my sister-in-law sent us:

Mmm, I didn’t do a good job with this picture, but I did want to show off the cross stitch David has been working on off and on (more off than on :D ) since before we were married. He’s making a push to finally finish it SOON.

sunday linkfest

In case we needed more help figuring out this whole writing gig, here are 54 tips from writers, for writers. I especially liked the quotes from Kurt Vonnegut.

Seth Godin on making the distinction between “not good” and “not for me”. Something I have to keep in mind when airing my often strong opinions about the books I read.

Too often, I have so much to accomplish, that I cannot properly savor and get into the things I am doing. The now is overshadowed by the distractions of the then. The One Thing Principle (via Handmade Homeschool) is a call to homeschoolers (and this can apply to everybody else, too!) to let ourselves focus on, explore, and relish just one thing a day. If we’re having a blast playing math and strategy games, it’s okay to let phonics slide for the day. If David and I are discussing my (admittedly wacky) worldbuilding, and ideas are bouncing thick and fast between us, it’s okay that I’m still only on lesson 7 of HTRYN. I shouldn’t let the things not done hover like grim specters over me.

friday fun: going outside

It’s warm, sunny and GORGEOUS out here. My Friday Fun was taking the kids to the park after lunch. The last time we were there (before all the snow and cold weather), Baron was not yet walking. It was so much fun to see him crunching through gravel and clambering over the wooden structures to keep up with his sibs today.

best part: All three kids swinging in a row, with me administrating pushes as necessary and calling out “Pump, pump! Pump your legs NOW!”

funniest/potentially bad parts: Sir I. yelling at the bottom of the slide: “I’ll catch the Baron, Mommy! I’ve got him!” So I send the Baron down and as soon as Sir I. sees the 25-pound toddler hurtling towards him, he jumps back and Baron plops onto the gravel (and pops right back up, unfazed). What was that about catching your brother, Sir I.??

Next time, I made sure that I was at the bottom to catch the baby. Sir I. tries to help the Baron get in position on the top of the slide, but Baron insists he comes down on his tummy. Well, at least he didn’t insist on coming down headfirst as well!

The not-fun part: David not being around to come to the park and enjoy the beautiful day with us! I missed him.

Writers need to get outside and get moving, too! What’s your favorite outdoor activity? Do you run, swim, or garden? Do you like to wander the woods taking pictures of flowers (that would be me!) or sit on a dock with your toes in the water? What memorable (in a good way!) outdoors experiences have you had?

I’m back!

I’m back from five-day trip, visiting my sister in sunny California. I scheduled two posts to go live while I was gone (ah, I love being able to post to my blog while I’m asleep or driving or shopping) so you might not have noticed that I was even gone. Here’s a quick rundown on my trip:

Hours spent on the plane: approximately 14 (yikes!)

Books read in that time: 3 (The Mermaid’s Madness by Jim C. Hines, The Well of Ascension by Brandon Sanderson, Soulless by Gail Carriger). Also, first chapter of Word Painting by a writer whose name escapes me.

Most unexpected title in an airport gift shop: Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter (I just can’t wrap my head around that premise. I keep getting a Does Not Compute error message).

Number of visits to the same Pakistani restaurant: 3. Twice for dinner (seekh kebabs and this *fantastic* chicken mali dish) and once for a brunch of halwa poori (mmmmm!)

Number of stores visited: Too many to count!

Newly-discovered TV show to obsess over: The remake of V: The Final Conflict. Alas, it’s only in its first season.

Returned home to: Grey skies, four smiling faces and 158 items in my RSS Feed!

Hope you all have had a lovely weekend/beginning of the week!

friday fun: names

Ah, names. Sometimes characters come to you with names neatly affixed; other times you have to sweat and curse and cudgel your brains and the dictionary, trying to pin down that elusive Perfect Name.

When I’m in the position of having to come up with a name, the first thing I do is to look at my worldbuilding notes, especially on cultural inspirations and language, for help. The Changeling is set in an alternative medieval Europe, so I went to a baby name website to look at Celtic, Gaelic and Germanic names for my characters. Often I know what sound I want the name to start with, which limits my choices. I like my names to have appropriate (or deliciously ironic) meanings, as well.

Season of Rains includes both Indian and Greek-inspired cultures, so I focused on names that sounded like they might come from those cultures (for instance, a lot of names that ended with -es). For Kai’s book I developed some rudimentary language, and made sure that my names followed the language conventions. So if the language of culture A does not have the ‘l’ sound, I cannot name their purebred queen Lamila. Similarly, if in culture B the -in suffix is feminine, my macho warrior dude cannot be Kevin.

Sometimes, though, you’re in the writing flow and cannot stop to come up with names. So you end up with placeholder names–and they end up sticking. Two brutes-for-hire in SoR are graced with the thuggish names of Thurgor and Ragor. One of the antagonists in Quartz bears the name of a smelly cheese (all hail the Marquis of Rocquefort!). Some day, I really must change his name…

How do you come up with names for your characters?

Play: a review

Play is something I’ve become in very interested in since having kids and ditched my left-brain-focused career plans for a more creative vocation (that would be writing stories *grin*). I picked “writer at play” for my tagline, not because I am a super-playful person but because I need the reminder to keep from turning the things I love doing into sheer drudgery. So, when I heard about this book, I knew I had to get it.

Brown looks at play through many different lenses, including research done in animal behavior, neuroscience and child development. He explores what play is, why play is ingrained across species, and what happens when we are deprived of play. In our world, play is considered childish, selfish, and unimportant; not pertinent to the serious business of having a job, raising a family, making a contribution to society.  Brown argues instead that play is a vital component of human development and healthy psyches.

There’s a lot of thought-provoking material in this book, so I’ll highlight those things that stood out for me.

Play is hard to define, but Brown narrows play down to a handful of properties. For him, play: is apparently purposeless; is voluntary; has inherent attraction (no one needs to twist our arms to do it); gives freedom from time (I was having so much fun I forgot what the time was!); diminishes our consciousness of self (we are too  involved to care what a spectacle we’re making of our selves); has improvisational potential (let’s try this a different way this time…); and provides continuation desire (when can we do this again??).

What is most interesting to me about his definition is that he doesn’t tag certain activities as inherently playful. Rather, play is a state of mind. For example, some people run because they want to be in shape. Others run because their friends do, or because it’s part of their training for something else. And some people run for the love of it, because that is what they want to do, because running itself is an end, not a means. In an example closer to home, for some of us writing is sheer joy, for others abject misery (yes, there are people out there who feel that way, strange as it might seem to me and you ;) ).

In discussing the role of play in child development, Brown emphasizes the importance of rough-and-tumble play, strangely enough in preventing adult violence. He cites a study which found a striking lack of rough-and-tumble play in the childhoods of a group of murderers in Texas (pg. 26). So, as the mother of three youngsters who have a often disturbing tendency to want to wrestle, poke, grab, and tickle each other–whew!

Brown emphasizes that not all of us play in the same way, and presents a few different play personalities: the Joker, the Kinesthete, the Explorer, the Competitor, the Director, the Collector, the Artist/Creator and the Storyteller. Most of us probably fall into a number of categories. I can safely put myself in the Storyteller category, probably with some overlap in Explorer (this refers to not just physical exploration, but intellectual, too). Competitions just make me foul (unless I win :D ), and I’m too much of the sedentary and serious type to fit into the first two.

Brown then goes on to describe what play-deprivation looks like, and how we as adults can recover play in out lives. Our children are luckier in that they have a stronger drive to play, but overscheduling and the cutting out of “extras” like art and music in schools make it difficult for our youngsters to play. The opposite of play, says Brown, is not work, but depression. Where work and play meet, Brown finds creativity, springing out of an amalgamation of purpose and spontaneity.

How can we recover play, then? Brown recommends several methods, the biggest one being movemnet. Movement is the original play, the proto-play, the things that babies first engage in. Physical activities get past mental defenses. Since my play personality is more of a sedentary one (reading in bed, writing on the computer), I forget to get up and get moving when I get stuck. Taking a play history–remembering the moments of pure fun and play–is another. We can also make time and space for play, and give ourselves permission to try things and fail.

Brown also delves a bit into the dark side of play, such as video game addiction and the beatings of homeless persons by laughing hoodlums. He is, I feel, too quick to dismiss those as not being really play. I also don’t buy into Brown’s conclusions about play as the answer to all the world’s evils—it does get a bit over-the-top. But he does bring into focus the importance of play in our lives.

Since having read this book, I am more mindful of what activities refresh me, make me loose track of time, where I take more pleasure in the process than the product. These include: playing piano; meeting a friend at a cafe in the evening after our husbands put the children to bed (how free and yuppie-ish we felt!); making a movie using goofy photos of the kids, complete with soundtrack and story; putting on music and dancing with children; getting lost in a book, or two, or more; and (this may sound bizarre) doing revision worksheets in Excel for Quartz (hey, even Left Brain wants to play–in its own way!).

How have you played recently?

titular

Here at the playground, I spent a couple of posts talking about that bane of my writing life–coming up with titles! Since I want that process to be less painful with more satisfying results, I went through my booklists to  find templates or formulae for titles.

First off, we have the one-word titles. These include names of people (Sabriel) or places (London). Straightforward and fairly safe. They’re not exciting but they get the job done. I prefer a little zing to my titles, so I like seeing more unusual nouns–novels named Dust–or compound words like Stardoc, Wintersmith, Inkheart. Then we have those nouns that are also adjectives. One that works for me is Soulless–a book that’s on my to-read list. I picked up an urban fantasy called Benighted once because of the title.

(Then there are the almost one-word titles that add an article to the noun–think John Grisham novels like The Firm and The Partner. I want to say that there are some historical romances out there with names like The Promise and The Keepsake. I’m not wild about this template.)

Now we come to the [adjective][noun], such as The Black Ship or The Red Wolf Conspiracy. These are workable, too. I’m not seeing any in my lists that has me filled with title-love.

Next up, titles that are [Something] [preposition][Something]. Most often, the preposition will be ‘of’ and we get titles like Prince of Darkness (how many vampires novels and historical novels could that title fit?–ha! I once read an autobiography called The Prince of Darkness!). That formula works for me if it juxtaposes two words your normally don’t see together. One I particularly like is Diplomacy of Wolves. A similar template is [Something]‘s [Something], so you have The Singer’s Crown, instead of The Crown of the Singer.

Then we have the [Someone] and the [Someone/Something] title. Nancy Drew and the Case of the Clever Clown! The Hardy Boys and the Trembling Turnip! Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Peter and the Starcatchers. I think this works when you’re trying to go for a certain adventurous almost-retro feel to the book. Sometimes you have [Noun] and [Noun], like Whiskey and Water. If you pick two nouns that go together without being a cliche and throw in alliteration, you have a winner in my book. :)

I also noted titles that are allusions to poetry and literature, like Burning Bright (Tracy Chevalier’s novel about William Blake).

Whew. After going through the lists of books I’ve read over the last couple of years, I think that the titles that work for me are the ones that find fresh new words for their genre. Heart, desire and passion are overused in romance. Fantasy is filled with kings and princes (ditto all other royal titles); crowns, thrones, swords. Find some new words, or a startling combination of words. I will certainly pick up a book named Drowned Wednesday or Superior Saturday. Compound words work for me, too. I get a delicious thrill when I see names like Mistborn and Grimspace (regardless of how I feel about the books).

Any other title templates I missed? What are some of your favorite book titles?