about reviewing

Alma Alexander’s post on reviewing writers (as in, writers who review other writers’ books, not the reviewing OF writers) popped up in my RSS feed as I was putting together my June reading roundup. It was timely because I always get this squeamish feeling before posting up reviews that are less than glowing. I like a lot of books, but I LOVE very few of them, and I’m not the sort to call a book “good” unless I really mean it. However, as a wannabe author, am I really brash enough to critique the works of people so far ahead of the game? Writers who have a lot more skill than I do? Writers that I might some day actually *gulp* meet?  Writing a novel is hard work. Knowing that, having experienced that, shouldn’t I be kinder towards other books?

One solution would be to not review books at all, but then you’d have a monthly list of books with no commentary. Or, I could review only the books I liked, and stay nothing about the ones I didn’t. So far, I’ve chosen to post my (tempered) reviews and stand behind my (tempered) opinions.

What say you? Do you read book reviews? What do you look for in a review? Do the rules of the reviewing game change if the reviewer is also a writer? If you do vent about books that push your buttons the wrong way, do you choose to not name them?

reading roundup

My June reads:

Most of the above are sequels to books I enjoyed in my childhood. I had a hankering to return to Diane Duane’s Wizards (her Deep Wizardry remains one of the most surprisingly poignant books I’ve ever encountered) books. A Wizard Alone, which happens after the death of Nita’s mom, was slow-paced, but in a good way, delving deeply into themes of loss, grief and loneliness. The next two books return to the saving-the-world motif, with Duane really raising the stakes. Wizards at War left a plot thread dangling, so I anticipate a sequel–and it looks like A Wizard of Mars is due to come out in 2010. Woohoo (even though it’s not about what I thought it would be about)!

House of Many Ways is one of two indirect sequels to Wynne Jones’ utterly charming Howl’s Moving Castle. Unfortunately, neither of them lived up to their prequel. I want more of Howl and Sophie, and I’m frustrated that they are secondary characters in both books. I didn’t take to Charmain much, and the plot felt thin and trivial, probably because of my lack of emotional attachment. It was not bad, just not what I was hoping for. Your mileage may vary.

After only two renewals, I made it through my library copy of David Copperfield. I’m daunted by writing even a mini-review of a classic, so here in random order are my thoughts about it: I liked it; I thought it differed greatly from a modern novel and that a contemporary editor would turn the first third of the book into backstory; I’m amused by the fact that this serious classic was probably considered low-brow popular entertainment in its day; yes, parts of it did read like a soap opera, and it was awfully convenient that David happend to always be around to witness intense emotional drama. Dickens is undoubtedly a fine writer. I found myself chuckling over and itching to steal many turns of phrases, including Miss Murdstone’s steel purse that “shut up like a bite”. In fact, Miss Murdstone’s metallic appearance, quite in keeping with her character, just begged to be transported into steampunk.

Yes, that was a very profound review, I know.

So, what about you guys (and gals)? Read anything interesting lately?

cityscapes, again

I came across a number of cityscapes in the artwork my kids have done in the last few months. Not only are cities fun to write about, they’re fun to draw/paint/otherwise make.

We did a cut-and-paste collage of a city skyline at night. Here is Sir I’s:

And Miss M’s (note how all her windows are up in the sky; she was very insistent about that):

Here’s a Russian buildings watercolor project Sir I. worked on:

Not a cityscape, but here’s Sir I’s Baba-Yaga inspired house (complete with antlers, bird head, croc tail and miscellaneous appendages):

fantastic cityscapes

I love cities with character, and I love reading books set in them. Regency romances set in London. Science fiction in bizarre domed cities on other planets. Underground cities. Walled cities. Cities held in the arms of gigantic trees. Cities of spidersilk and magical glass. Ancient ruined cities. It’s my urban upbringing, I suppose, continuing to exert a fascinating pull.

Here’s some freewriting I did for Blackburn, the city which is the setting of Out of Shape. I wanted a handle on the city, turning it into a bit player, and solidifying it in my mind as the setting for future stories:

The sun never shone in Blackburn. The tall dark buildings marched shoulder to shoulder, closing ranks against the light. The sky was never seen in Blackburn, either, for the black smog hung low and thick like oily clouds. Occasionally, from the industrial district would come the belch and roar and hiss of fire shooting up tall chimneys; fire that fountained into sparks and quickly died amidst the gloom, and a movement of air would bring the sooty taste of smoke to the lips of the few pedestrians hurrying through the streets, eager to be inside.

The streets of Blackburn belonged to the machines. Trolleys trundled by on tracks; cars swung from cables overhead. Where they came from, where they went, no one knew. Sometimes empty, sometimes full of mysterious boxes and bundles, other times groaning with the weight of rusty iron and snapped cable, they came from the sullen gloom of the outerlands of Blackburn and disappeared into that same eternal night. For most, the machines were a backdrop to life in Blackburn, the clatter of wheels and whine of gears lullabies to Blackburn babies. There were people whose job it was to work with the machinery; soot-smeared cable boys as agile as monkeys; muscled trolley lads and raucous bridge workers. In the depths of Blackburn, down through many levels were more machines, bigger machines that demanded fuel and belched fire and there were operators down there, moving like shadows amidst the fiery furnaces – but polite people did not talk of them.

There were many ways of living in Blackburn, but for the majority, most of the living happened indoors; in apartments as close and hot as ovens, in smoky bars and noisy pubs, each with their doors and shutters closed tight against the bitter-tasting air. Blackburn was a city of darkness on the outside, but every time a door opened, it revealed a glowing orange interior, bright and jewel-like, quickly hidden again. The pedestrians who had been so wary upon the streets, muffled in scarves and coats, heads down and eyes sliding sideways, shed their outer clothing in layers, unfolded their bodies and became merry, laughing raucously. Sometimes a snatch of their laughter, the muffled groans of organ-grinders, the pounding of nailed boots upon bare boards in a jig, would drift out into the silent streets where the machines and their human workers went about their tasks.

Which cities, real or imaginary, your own or someone else’s, are you fascinated by?